4.6 Article

Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/048

Keywords

cosmology with extra dimensions; gravitational waves / theory; modified gravity

Funding

  1. NSF [DGE-1656466, DGE-1746045, PHY-1708081]
  2. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  3. Marion and Stuart Rice Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The observation of GW170817 in both gravitational and electromagnetic waves provides a number of unique tests of general relativity. One question we can answer with this event is: do large-wavelength gravitational waves and short-frequency photons experience the same number of spacetime dimensions? In models that include additional non-compact spacetime dimensions, as the gravitational waves propagate, they leak into the extra dimensions, leading to a reduction in the amplitude of the observed gravitational waves, and a commensurate systematic error in the inferred distance to the gravitational wave source. Electromagnetic waves would remain unaffected. We compare the inferred distance to GW170817 from the observation of gravitational waves, d(L)(GW), with the inferred distance to the electromagnetic counterpart NGC 4993, d(L)(EM). We constrain d(L)(GW) = (d(L)(EM)/Mpc)(gamma) with gamma = 1.01(-0.05)(+0.04) (for the SHoES value of H-0) or gamma = 0.99(-0.05)(+0.03) (for the Planck value of H-0), where all values are MAP and minimal 68% credible intervals. These constraints imply that gravitational waves propagate in D = 3 + 1 spacetime dimensions, as expected in general relativity. In particular, we find that D = 4.02(-0.10)(+0.07) (SHoES) and D = 3.98(-0.09)(+0.07) (Planck). Furthermore, we place limits on the screening scale for theories with D > 4 spacetime dimensions, finding that the screening scale must be greater than similar to 20Mpc. We also place a lower limit on the lifetime of the graviton of t > 4.50 > 10(8) yr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available