4.6 Article

CMB-galaxy correlation in Unified Dark Matter scalar field cosmologies

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/039

Keywords

dark matter theory; integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect; dark energy theory; galaxy surveys

Funding

  1. La Fondazione Ing. Aldo Gini
  2. ASI [I/016/07/0]
  3. UK Science and Technology Facilities Research Council (STFC)
  4. CNPq [150143/2010-9]
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F007531/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [ST/F007531/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analysis of the cross-correlation between the CMB and the large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe in Unified Dark Matter (UDM) scalar field cosmologies. We work out the predicted cross-correlation function in UDM models, which depends on the speed of sound of the unified component, and compare it with observations from six galaxy catalogues (NVSS, HEAO, 2MASS, and SDSS main galaxies, luminous red galaxies, and quasars). We sample the value of the speed of sound and perform a likelihood analysis, finding that the UDM model is as likely as the Lambda CDM, and is compatible with observations for a range of values of c(proportional to) (the value of the sound speed at late times) on which structure formation depends. In particular, we obtain an upper bound of c(proportional to)(2) <= 0.009 at 95% confidence level, meaning that the Lambda CDM model, for which c(proportional to)(2) = 0, is a good fit to the data, while the posterior probability distribution peaks at the value c(proportional to)(2) = 10(-4). Finally, we study the time dependence of the deviation from Lambda CDM via a tomographic analysis using a mock redshift distribution and we find that the largest deviation is for low-redshift sources, suggesting that future low-z surveys will be best suited to constrain UDM models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available