4.6 Article

Cosmological constraints on decaying dark matter

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/06/005

Keywords

dark matter; cosmology of theories beyond the SM

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Direccion General de Relaciones Internacionales de la Secretaria de Educacion Publica (DGRI-SEP) of Mexico
  3. Ontario Premier's Research Excellence Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a complete analysis of the cosmological constraints on decaying dark matter. Previous analyses have used the cosmic microwave background and Type Ia supernova. We have updated them with the latest data as well as extended the analysis with the inclusion of Lyman-alpha forest, large scale structure and weak lensing observations. Astrophysical constraints are not considered in the present paper. The bounds on the lifetime of decaying dark matter are dominated by either the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect for the scenario with weak reionization, or CMB polarization observations when there is significant reionization. For the respective scenarios, the lifetimes for decaying dark matter are Gamma(-1) greater than or similar to 100 Gyr and (f Gamma)(-1) greater than or similar to 5.3 x 10(8) Gyr (at 95.4% confidence level), where the phenomenological parameter f is the fraction of the decay energy deposited in baryonic gas. This allows us to constrain particle physics models with dark matter candidates through investigation of dark matter decays into Standard Model particles via effective operators. For decaying dark matter of similar to 100 GeV mass, we found that the size of the coupling constant in the effective dimension-4 operators responsible for dark matter decay has to generically be less than or similar to 10(-22). We have also explored the implications of our analysis for representative models in theories of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, minimal supergravity and little Higgs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available