4.6 Article

Searching for a correlation between cosmic-ray sources above 1019 eV and large scale structure

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/05/006

Keywords

ultra high energy cosmic rays; cosmic rays; superclusters and voids; cosmological simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the anisotropy signature which is expected if the sources of ultrahigh energy, > 10(19) eV, cosmic rays (UHECRs) are extra-galactic and trace the large scale distribution of luminous matter. Using the PSCz galaxy catalog as a tracer of the large scale structure (LSS), we derive the expected all sky angular distribution of the UHECR intensity. We de. ne a statistic that measures the correlation between the predicted and observed UHECR arrival direction distributions, and show that it is more sensitive to the expected anisotropy signature than the power spectrum and the two-point correlation function. The distribution of the correlation statistic is not sensitive to the unknown redshift evolution of UHECR source density and to the unknown strength and structure of inter-galactic magnetic fields. We show, using this statistic, that recently published > 5.7 x 10(19) eV Auger data are inconsistent with isotropy at similar or equal to 98% CL, and consistent with a source distribution that traces LSS, with some preference for a source distribution that is biased with respect to the galaxy distribution. The anisotropy signature should be detectable also at lower energy, > 4 x 10(19) eV. A few-fold increase of the Auger exposure is likely to increase the significance to > 99% CL, but not to > 99.9% CL ( unless the UHECR source density is comparable to or larger than that of galaxies). In order to distinguish between different bias models, the systematic uncertainty in the absolute energy calibration of the experiments should be reduced to well below the current similar or equal to 25%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available