4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Sub-100 nm gold nanomatryoshkas improve photo-thermal therapy efficacy in large and highly aggressive triple negative breast tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages 90-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.038

Keywords

Nanomatryoshka; Multilayer nanoshells Au/SiO2/Au; Photothermal therapy; Near infrared; Gold nanoparticle

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000371] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R0I 5R01 CA151962, UO1 CA151886, R01 CA151962, P30CA125123, P50 CA58183] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an unmet need for efficient near-infrared photothermal transducers for the treatment of highly aggressive cancers and large tumors where the penetration of light can be substantially reduced, and the intra-tumoral nanoparticle transport is restricted due to the presence of hypoxic or necrotic regions. We report the performance advantages obtained by sub 100 nm gold nanomatryushkas, comprising concentric gold-silica-gold layers compared to conventional similar to 150 nm silica core gold nanoshells for photothermal therapy of triple negative breast cancer. We demonstrate that a 33% reduction in silica-core-gold-shell nanoparticle size, while retaining near-infrared plasmon resonance, and keeping the nanoparticle surface charge constant, results in a four to five fold tumor accumulation of nanoparticles following equal dose of injected gold for both sizes. The survival time of mice bearing large (>1000 mm(3)) and highly aggressive triple negative breast tumors is doubled for the nanomatryushka treatment group under identical photo-thermal therapy conditions. The higher absorption cross-section of a nanomatryoshka results in a higher efficiency of photonic to thermal energy conversion and coupled with 4-5 x accumulation within large tumors results in superior therapy efficacy. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available