4.8 Article

Improved in vivo delivery of m-THPC via pegylated liposomes for use in photodynamic therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 157, Issue 2, Pages 196-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.085

Keywords

m-THPC; Photosensitiser; Photodynamic therapy; Liposomes; Polyethylene glycol; Pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. European Community [FP7/2007-2013, 201031]
  2. UK Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  3. Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University College London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pegylated liposomal nanocarriers have been developed with the aim of achieving improved uptake of the clinical PDT photosensitiser, m-THPC, into target tissues through increased circulation time and bioavailability. This study investigates the biodistribution and PDT efficacy of m-THPC in its standard formulation (Foscan (R)) compared to m-THPC incorporated in liposomes with different degrees of pegylation (FosPEG 2% and FosPEG 8%), following i.v. administration to normal and tumour bearing rats. The plasma pharmacokinetics were described using a three compartmental analysis and gave elimination half lives of 90 h, 99 h and 138 h for Foscan (R), FosPEG 2% and 8% respectively. The accumulation of m-THPC in tumour and normal tissues, including skin, showed that maximal tumour to skin ratios were observed at <= 24 h with FosPEG 2% and 8%, whilst skin photosensitivity studies showed Foscan (R) induces more damage compared to the liposomes at drug-light intervals of 96 and 168 h. PDT treatment at 24 h post-administration (0.05 mg kg(-1)) showed higher tumour necrosis using pegylated liposomal formulations in comparison to Foscan (R), which is attributed to the higher tumour uptake and blood plasma concentrations. Clinically, this improved selectivity has the potential to reduce not only normal tissue damage, but the drug dose required and cutaneous photosensitivity. (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available