4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Anticancer nanomedicine and tumor vascular permeability; Where is the missing link?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 164, Issue 3, Pages 265-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.013

Keywords

Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR); Nanomedicine; Drug targeting; Vascular permeability; Tumor vessel; Pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. HRC Emerging Researcher First Grant [PL. 108360.01.P.LM]
  2. UORG
  3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Otago University [AG305]
  4. [PL. 108403.01.S. LM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anticancer nanomedicine was coined to describe anticancer delivery systems such as polymer conjugates, liposomes, micelles, and metal nanoparticles. These anticancer delivery platforms have been developed with the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect as a central mechanism for tumor targeting. EPR based nanomedicine has demonstrated, beyond doubt, to selectively target tumor tissues in animal models. However, over the last two decades, only nine anticancer agents utilizing this targeting strategy have been approved for clinical use. In this review, we systematically analyze various aspects that explain the limited clinical progress yet achieved. The influence of nanomedicine physicochemical characteristics, animal tumor models, and variations in tumor biology, on EPR based tumor targeting is closely examined. Furthermore, we reviewed results from over one hundred publications to construct patterns of factors that can influence the transition of EPR based anticancer nanomedicine to the clinic. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available