4.8 Article

Delivery of messenger RNA using poly(ethylene imine)-poly(ethylene glycol)-copolymer blends for polyplex formation: Biophysical characterization and in vitro transfection properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 148, Issue 3, Pages 334-343

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.09.007

Keywords

mRNA; Poly(ethylene imine); Polyplex; Transfection; Gene delivery

Funding

  1. CureVac GmbH, Tubingen, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nucleic acid based therapies have so far mainly been focused on plasmid DNA (pDNA), small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense and immunostimulatory oligonucleotides. Messenger RNA (mRNA) was the subject of only a few studies. The objective of this investigation was the preparation of new composite polyplexes with mRNA consisting of poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) and poly(ethylene imine)-poly(ethylene glycol)-copolymers (PEI-PEG) as blends. These complexes were designed to increase the stability of mRNA, to improve transfection efficiency and to reduce cytotoxicity. Hydrodynamic diameters of the polyplexes were measured by dynamic light scattering, polyplex stability was analyzed by gel retardation assay and transfection efficiency of luciferase (Luc) encoding mRNA was evaluated under in vitro conditions. Most of the polyplexes generated showed small particle sizes <200 nm and positive zeta-potentials of +20 mV to +30 mV. Stable complexes were formed even at low nitrogen to phosphate ratios. Polyplexes with mRNA Luc and blends of low molecular weight PEI(5 kDa) and PEI(25 kDa)-PEG(20 kDa)(1)-block-copolymer showed protein expression as high as polyplexes with PEI(25 kDa). Moreover, luciferase expression was significantly higher than that obtained with one of the components alone. These results suggest that delivery systems for pulmonary application of mRNA merit further investigation under in vitro and in vivo conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available