4.8 Article

Ultrasound-enhanced delivery of targeted echogenic liposomes in a novel ex vivo mouse aorta model

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 144, Issue 3, Pages 288-295

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.02.030

Keywords

Ultrasound-assisted delivery; Liposomes; ICAM-1 targeting; Vascular endothelium; Atheroma

Funding

  1. NINDS, NIH [NS047603]
  2. NIGMS, NIH [T32GM063483]
  3. Albert J. Ryan Foundation
  4. Rindsberg Memorial Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to determine whether targeted, Rhodamine-labeled echogenic liposomes (Rh-ELIP) containing nanobubbles could be delivered to the arterial wall, and whether 1-MHz continuous wave ultrasound would enhance this delivery profile. Aortae excised from apolipoprotein-E-deficient (n = 8) and wild-type (n = 8) mice were mounted in a pulsatile flow system through which Rh-ELIP were delivered in a stream of bovine serum albumin. Half the aortae from each group were treated with 1-MHz continuous wave ultrasound at 0.49 MPa peak-to-peak pressure, and half underwent sham exposure. Ultrasound parameters were chosen to promote stable cavitation and avoid inertial cavitation. A broadband hydrophone was used to monitor cavitation activity. After treatment, aortic sections were prepared for histology and analyzed by an individual blinded to treatment conditions. Delivery of Rh-ELIP to the vascular endothelium was observed, and sub-endothelial penetration of Rh-ELIP was present in five of five ultrasound-treated aortae and was absent in those not exposed to ultrasound. However, the degree of penetration in the ultrasound-exposed aortae was variable. There was no evidence of ultrasound-mediated tissue damage in any specimen. Ultrasound-enhanced delivery within the arterial wall was demonstrated in this novel model, which allows quantitative evaluation of therapeutic delivery. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available