4.8 Article

Multi-ion-crosslinked nanoparticles with pH-responsive characteristics for oral delivery of protein drugs

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages 141-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.08.020

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Oral delivery; Insulin; Paracellular transport; Tight junction

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC 96-2120-M-007-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

pH-Responsive nanoparticles composed of chitosan (G) and poly-gamma-glutamic acid (-y-PGA) blended with tripolyphosphate (TPP) and MgSO4 (multi-ion-crosslinked NPs) were prepared and characterized to determine their effectiveness in the oral delivery of insulin. Their counterparts without TPP and MgSO4 (NPs) were used as a control. Fr-IR and XRD results indicated that the spontaneous interaction between CS, insulin, gamma-PGA, MgSO4 and TPP can form an ionically crosslinked network-structure, leading to the formation of nanoparticles. Multi-ion-crosslinked NPs were more compact than NPs, while their zeta potential values were comparable. During storage, multi-ion-crosslinked NPs suspended in deionized water were stable for at least 10 weeks. Multi-ion-crosslinked NPs had a superior stability over a broader pH range than NPs. In the in vitro release study, NPs failed to provide an adequate retention of loaded insulin in dissolution media compared to multi-ion-crosslinked NPs. Transepithelial-electrical-resistance and transport experiments demonstrated that multi-ion-crosslinked NPs significantly more effectively transported insulin than NPs; confocal visualization further validated the enhanced permeation of insulin via the paracellular pathway. The aforementioned results suggest that multi-ion-crosslinked NPs are a promising carrier for improved transmucosal delivery of insulin in the small intestine. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available