4.1 Article

After the crash: Research-based theater for knowledge transfer

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/chp.177

Keywords

education; continuing; brain injury theater; knowledge transfer; professional education; evaluation

Funding

  1. Health Care, Technology, and Place (HCTP)
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [CIHR]
  3. Strategic Alliance Fund
  4. Ontario Rehabilitation Research Network
  5. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
  6. Ontario Work Study Program
  7. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in Ontario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The aim of this project was to develop and evaluate a research-based dramatic production for the purpose of transferring knowledge about traumatic brain injury (TBI) to health care professionals, managers, and decision makers. Methods: Using results drawn from six focus group discussions with key stakeholders (consumers, informal care-givers, and health care practitioners experienced in the field of TBI) and relevant scientific literature, a 50-minute play was produced for the purpose of conveying the experiences of TBI survivors, informal care providers, and health practitioners and best practice for TBI care. A self-administered postperformance survey was distributed to audience members at the end of four performances in Ontario, Canada, to evaluate the play's efficacy. Two hundred ninety-one questionnaires were completed. The questionnaire had five questions scored on a 5-item Likert scale with space for open-ended comments. Results: Consistently high mean scores from the questionnaires indicate that theater is a highly efficacious and engaging method of knowledge transfer, particularly for complex material that deals with human emotion and interpersonal relationships. Discussion: Responses supported the effectiveness of drama as a knowledge translation strategy and identified its potential to impact practice positively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available