4.5 Article

Retention and release of TiO2 nanoparticles in unsaturated porous media during dynamic saturation change

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 3-4, Pages 199-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.07.010

Keywords

TiO2; Nanoparticles; Retention and release; Unsaturated porous media; Drainage/imbibition

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency [R832529]
  2. EPA [R832529, 909078] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The retention and release of TiO2 nanoparticles in porous media (packed glass beads) were studied under transient unsaturated conditions as the media were taken through multiple drainage/imbibition (drying/wetting) cycles at three different pH values. The focus of the work was to better understand the role of changing water table levels and rainfall infiltration events on the ultimate mobility of TiO2 nanoparticles. Results indicate that retention during saturated transport varied considerably, from very strong retention at pH 5 (likely due to electrostatic interactions), to no measurable retention at pH 10. During primary drainage, additional retention (i.e., beyond what was retained during initial saturation) was observed at all pH values. During subsequent imbibition/drainage cycles where nanoparticle-free water was imbibed into the porous medium prior to drainage, the mass of retained TiO2 remained nearly constant at all three pH values. Final imbibition/drainage and subsequent flushing, both using solution conditions adjusted to favor high mobility, showed very little additional nanoparticle release. These results indicate that the release of TiO2 nanoparticles following retention by either saturated or unsaturated packed glass beads was difficult to achieve, regardless of the likely initial mechanisms of retention, even when solution conditions were changed to those that should favor high mobility. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available