4.5 Article

Advanced analysis of multi-span suspension bridges

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 29-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.015

Keywords

Multi-span suspension bridge; Refined plastic hinge; Catenary cable; Stability function

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1A200 7054]
  3. Korea Ministry of Land, Transportation Maritime Affairs (MLTM) through Core Research Project 1 of Super Long Span Bridge RD Center
  4. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [52525] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an efficient analysis method considering both geometric and material nonlinearities is proposed for predicting the ultimate strength and behavior of multi-span suspension bridges. The geometric nonlinearities of the cable members due to sag effects are captured using the catenary element, while the geometric nonlinearities of the beam-column members due to second-order effects are captured using the stability functions. The material nonlinearities of the cable and beam-column members are considered using elastic-plastic hinge and refined plastic hinge models, respectively. A simple initial shape analysis method is presented to determine the deformed shape and initial cable tension of the bridge under dead loads. Numerical examples are presented to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method. In addition, a case study on a four-span suspension bridge is carried out to show the capability of the proposed method in estimating the strength and behavior of very large scale structures. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available