4.5 Article

Framework for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Due to Asphalt Pavement Construction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 138, Issue 11, Pages 1312-1321

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000549

Keywords

Asphalt pavement; Life-cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas; Feasibility study

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology of Korea [2010-0014365, 2011-0030841]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0030841, 과C6A1704, 2010-0014365] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greenhouse gas (GRG) emissions are an important primary criteria for environmental evaluation. As a project evaluation criterion, this study developed a framework that could estimate GHG emissions in asphalt pavement construction based on the limited information available in the feasibility study phase. A thorough literature review and in-depth interviews with domain experts in the field of road engineering were conducted to identify the input variables for this framework. By considering the characteristics of the input variables, such as material type, geometric shape of the structure, and earthwork quantities, an artificial neural network and a parametric calculation were used to develop the framework for estimating GHG emissions. When applied to real-life asphalt pavement projects in the Republic of Korea, the framework produced an average estimation error of 11.2%, which was considered sufficiently accurate for the planning phase. The proposed framework is expected to help decision makers easily evaluate the GHG emission potential of asphalt pavement projects in their preliminary phase such that project viability and priority can be determined in a more holistic manner. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000549. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available