4.6 Article

Combined Model-Free Data-Interpretation Methodologies for Damage Detection during Continuous Monitoring of Structures

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 657-666

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000289

Keywords

Data analysis; Regression analysis; Damage; Monitoring; Structural health monitoring; Model free; Data interpretation; Regression analysis; Robust regression analysis (RRA); Support vector regression (SVR); Random forest (RF); Damage detectability; Time to detection

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-126385]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_126385] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the recent advances in sensor technologies and data-acquisition systems, interpreting measurement data for structural monitoring remains a challenge. Furthermore, because of the complexity of the structures, materials used, and uncertain environments, behavioral models are difficult to build accurately. This paper presents novel model-free data-interpretation methodologies that combine moving principal component analysis (MPCA) with each of four regression-analysis methodsrobust regression analysis (RRA), multiple linear analysis (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF)for damage detection during continuous monitoring of structures. The principal goal is to exploit the advantages of both MPCA and regression-analysis methods. The applicability of these combined methods is evaluated and compared with individual applications of MPCA, RRA, MLR, SVR, and RF through four case studies. Result showed that the combined methods outperformed noncombined methods in terms of damage detectability and time to detection. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available