4.4 Article

Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest affinities with the binding energy distribution analysis method (BEDAM)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 505-516

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9552-3

Keywords

BEDAM; AGBNP; Binding free energy; Host-guest; SAMPL3; Replica exchange

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [GM30580]
  2. NIH [1 S10 RR022375, 1 S10 RR027444]
  3. Lonestar4 cluster at Texas Advanced Computing Center under TeraGrid/XSEDE National Science Foundation [TG-MCB100145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BEDAM calculations are described to predict the free energies of binding of a series of anaesthetic drugs to a recently characterized acyclic cucurbituril host. The modeling predictions, conducted as part of the SAMPL3 host-guest affinity blind challenge, are generally in good quantitative agreement with the experimental measurements. The correlation coefficient between computed and measured binding free energies is 70% with high statistical significance. Multiple conformational stereoisomers and protonation states of the guests have been considered. Better agreement is obtained with high statistical confidence under acidic modeling conditions. It is shown that this level of quantitative agreement could have not been reached without taking into account reorganization energy and configurational entropy effects. Extensive conformational variability of the host, the guests and their complexes is observed in the simulations, affecting binding free energy estimates and structural predictions. A conformational reservoir technique is introduced as part of the parallel Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics BEDAM protocol to fully capture conformational variability. It is shown that these advanced computational strategies lead to converged free energy estimates for these systems, offering the prospect of utilizing host-guest binding free energy data for force field validation and development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available