4.4 Article

Detection of ligand binding hot spots on protein surfaces via fragment-based methods: application to DJ-1 and glucocerebrosidase

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 491-500

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-009-9283-2

Keywords

Fragment-based drug design; Structure-based drug design; Hot spot identification; DJ-1; Glucocerebrosidase; Parkinson's disease; Gaucher's disease; Pharmacological chaperones

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [F32NS061415]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM064700]
  3. National Institutes of Health [F32AG027647]
  4. American Parkinson's Disease Association
  5. McKnight Endowment Fund
  6. Ellison Medical Foundation
  7. US Department of Energy
  8. National Cancer Institute [Y1-CO-1020]
  9. National Institute of General Medical Science [Y1-GM-1104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of hot spots, i.e., binding regions that contribute substantially to the free energy of ligand binding, is a critical step for structure-based drug design. Here we present the application of two fragment-based methods to the detection of hot spots for DJ-1 and glucocerebrosidase (GCase), targets for the development of therapeutics for Parkinson's and Gaucher's diseases, respectively. While the structures of these two proteins are known, binding information is lacking. In this study we employ the experimental multiple solvent crystal structures (MSCS) method and computational fragment mapping (FTMap) to identify regions suitable for the development of pharmacological chaperones for DJ-1 and GCase. Comparison of data derived via MSCS and FTMap also shows that FTMap, a computational method for the identification of fragment binding hot spots, is an accurate and robust alternative to the performance of expensive and difficult crystallographic experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available