4.2 Article

A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 237-256

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2013.07.007

Keywords

Multi-attribute group decision making; Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set; Aggregation operator; Karnik-Mendel algorithms

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71061006, 61263018]
  2. Humanities Social Science Programming Project of Ministry of Education of China [09YGC630107]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China [20114BAB201012]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi province educational department of China [GJJ12265, GJJ12740]
  5. Excellent Young Academic Talent Support Program of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ranking of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) is very important for the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making. From the probability viewpoint, the possibility degree of comparison between two interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs) is defined by using the notion of 2-dimensional random vector, and a new method is then developed to rank IVIFNs. Hereby the ordered weighted average operator and hybrid weighted average operator for IVIFNs are defined based on the Karnik-Mendel algorithms and employed to solve multi-attribute group decision making problems with IVIFNs. The individual overall attribute values of alternatives are obtained by using the weighted average operator for IVIFNs. By using the hybrid weighted average operator for IVIFNs, we can obtain the collective overall attribute values of alternatives, which are used to rank the alternatives. A numerical example is examined to illustrate the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed method in this paper. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available