4.7 Article

Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary?

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 230, Issue 22, Pages 8304-8312

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.030

Keywords

Two-phase flow; Galerkin finite element methods; Upwind schemes

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. CLEAN
  3. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two alternatives of primary variables are compared for two-phase flow in heterogeneous media by solving fully established benchmarks. The first combination utilizes pressure of the wetting fluid and saturation of the non-wetting fluid as primary variables, while the second employs capillary pressure of the wetting fluid and pressure of the non-wetting fluid. While the standard Galerkin finite element method (SGFEM) is known to fail in the physical reproduction of two-phase flow in heterogeneous media (unless employing a fully upwind correction), the second scheme with capillary pressure as a primary variable without applying an upwind technique produces correct physical fluid behaviour in heterogeneous media, as observed from experiments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available