4.1 Article

Studying spike trains using a van Rossum metric with a synapse-like filter

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 149-155

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-008-0106-6

Keywords

Spike trains; Information; Metric; Song birds; Auditory pathway

Funding

  1. International Human Frontiers Science Program Organization shortterm fellowship
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [06/RFP/BIM020]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [06/RFP/BIM020] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spike trains are unreliable. For example, in the primary sensory areas, spike patterns and precise spike times will vary between responses to the same stimulus. Nonetheless, information about sensory inputs is communicated in the form of spike trains. A challenge in understanding spike trains is to assess the significance of individual spikes in encoding information. One approach is to define a spike train metric, allowing a distance to be calculated between pairs of spike trains. In a good metric, this distance will depend on the information the spike trains encode. This method has been used previously to calculate the timescale over which the precision of spike times is significant. Here, a new metric is constructed based on a simple model of synaptic conductances which includes binding site depletion. Including binding site depletion in the metric means that a given individual spike has a smaller effect on the distance if it occurs soon after other spikes. The metric proves effective at classifying neuronal responses by stimuli in the sample data set of electro-physiological recordings from the primary auditory area of the zebra finch fore-brain. This shows that this is an effective metric for these spike trains suggesting that in these spike trains the significance of a spike is modulated by its proximity to previous spikes. This modulation is a putative information-coding property of spike trains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available