4.5 Article

Recovering the Treelike Trend of Evolution Despite Extensive Lateral Genetic Transfer: A Probabilistic Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 93-112

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0234

Keywords

lateral gene transfer; phylogenetic reconstruction; quartet reconstruction

Funding

  1. NSF [DMS-1007144]
  2. USA-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  3. Israel Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1248176, 1149312] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lateral gene transfer (LGT) is a common mechanism of nonvertical evolution, during which genetic material is transferred between two more or less distantly related organisms. It is particularly common in bacteria where it contributes to adaptive evolution with important medical implications. In evolutionary studies, LGT has been shown to create widespread discordance between gene trees as genomes become mosaics of gene histories. In particular, the Tree of Life has been questioned as an appropriate representation of bacterial evolutionary history. Nevertheless a common hypothesis is that prokaryotic evolution is primarily treelike, but that the underlying trend is obscured by LGT. Extensive empirical work has sought to extract a common treelike signal from conflicting gene trees. Here we give a probabilistic perspective on the problem of recovering the treelike trend despite LGT. Under a model of randomly distributed LGT, we show that the species phylogeny can be reconstructed even in the presence of surprisingly many (almost linear number of) LGT events per gene tree. Our results, which are optimal up to logarithmic factors, are based on the analysis of a robust, computationally efficient reconstruction method and provides insight into the design of such methods. Finally, we show that our results have implications for the discovery of highways of gene sharing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available