4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Multiplex De Novo Sequencing of Peptide Antibiotics

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1371-1381

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2011.0158

Keywords

algorithms; biochemical networks; mass spectroscopy; microbial ecology

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1-P41-RR024851-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM086283] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proliferation of drug-resistant diseases raises the challenge of searching for new, more efficient antibiotics. Currently, some of the most effective antibiotics (i.e., Vancomycin and Daptomycin) are cyclic peptides produced by non-ribosomal biosynthetic pathways. The isolation and sequencing of cyclic peptide antibiotics, unlike the same activity with linear peptides, is time-consuming and error-prone. The dominant technique for sequencing cyclic peptides is nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based and requires large amounts (milligrams) of purified materials that, for most compounds, are not possible to obtain. Given these facts, there is a need for new tools to sequence cyclic non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs) using picograms of material. Since nearly all cyclic NRPs are produced along with related analogs, we develop a mass spectrometry approach for sequencing all related peptides at once (in contrast to the existing approach that analyzes individual peptides). Our results suggest that instead of attempting to isolate and NMR-sequence the most abundant compound, one should acquire spectra of many related compounds and sequence all of them simultaneously using tandem mass spectrometry. We illustrate applications of this approach by sequencing new variants of cyclic peptide antibiotics from Bacillus brevis, as well as sequencing a previously unknown family of cyclic NRPs produced by marine bacteria. Supplementary Material is available online at www.liebertonline.com/cmb

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available