4.4 Article

Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI using Ω-plots

Journal

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 1196-1208

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3362

Keywords

CEST; Omega-plot; pulsed pre-saturation; creatine; MRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) allows the indirect detection of dilute metabolites in living tissue via MRI of the tissue water signal. Selective radio frequency (RF) with amplitude B-1 is used to saturate the magnetization of protons of exchanging groups, which transfer the saturation to the abundant water pool. In a clinical setup, the saturation scheme is limited to a series of short pulses to follow regulation of the specific absorption rate (SAR). Pulsed saturation is difficult to describe theoretically, thus rendering quantitative CEST a challenging task. In this study, we propose a new analytical treatment of pulsed CEST by extending a former interleaved saturation-relaxation approach. Analytical integration of the continuous wave (cw) eigenvalue as a function of the RF pulse shape leads to a formula for pulsed CEST that has the same structure as that for cw CEST, but incorporates two form factors that are determined by the pulse shape. This enables analytical Z-spectrum calculations and permits deeper insight into pulsed CEST. Furthermore, it extends Dixon's Omega-plot method to the case of pulsed saturation, yielding separately, and independently, the exchange rate and the relative proton concentration. Consequently, knowledge of the form factors allows a direct comparison of the effect of the strength and B-1 dispersion of pulsed CEST experiments with the ideal case of cw saturation. The extended pulsed CEST quantification approach was verified using creatine phantoms measured on a 7 T whole-body MR tomograph, and its range of validity was assessed by simulations. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available