4.6 Article

Acceptance Criteria for Tensile Characterization of Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix Systems for Concrete and Masonry Repair

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000886

Keywords

Acceptance criteria; Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM); Guidelines; Material characterization; Shear bond test; Steel reinforced grout (SRG); Tensile test; Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM)

Funding

  1. University Transportation Center Research on Concrete
  2. Applications for Sustainable Transportation (RE-CAST) under US DOT Grant [DTRT13-G-UTC45]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) Industry/University Center for Integration of Composites into Infrastructure (CICI) [NSF IIP-1439543]
  4. Italian Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MAECI) for the Research Project Composites with inorganic matrix for sustainable strengthening of architectural heritage [PGR00234]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites are a new class of materials used to repair and strengthen existing structures. Mechanical performance varies widely based on the type and volume of fibers, fabric architecture, mortar properties, and bond characteristics. Moreover, test setup and boundary conditions are of the utmost importance for their mechanical characterization because of the complex interaction between fabric and brittle matrix. Therefore, the challenge is to define characterization and acceptance criteria that are (1)suitable for a wide spectrum of existing FRCM systems, and (2)produce representative values for the design of strengthened members. In this paper, three FRCM systems comprising carbon, glass, and steel fabrics were tested in accordance with two different acceptance methods. One method, which has been developed and adopted in the United States, is based on tensile tests on FRCM coupons with a clevis-grip mechanism that allows slippage at the fabric-matrix interface and provides mechanical properties that are directly used for design. The other method, developed within RILEM TC 250-CSM, combines the results of clamping-grip tensile tests on bare textile specimens with those of FRCM-to-substrate shear bond tests to obtain mechanical properties accounting for a broad range of possible failure modes. The results provided by the two methods are discussed and compared in relation to FRCM field applications. (c) 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available