4.6 Article

CFRP-Confined Square RC Columns. II: Cyclic Axial Compression Stress-Strain Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 161-170

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000246

Keywords

Columns; Reinforced concrete; Confinement; Fiber reinforced polymer; Constitutive models

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078109, 50408010]
  2. Heilongjiang Provincial Foundation for Returned Overseas Scholars [LC2011C23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the seismic design of fiber reinforcement polymer (FRP) confined reinforced concrete (RC) columns, the development of an accurate axial stress-strain model that considers cyclic compression is necessary. In light of such a demand, this paper presents a cyclic axial stress-strain model for FRP-confined RC square columns. The model is informed from physical observations and test measurements obtained from an experimental investigation reported in the companion paper, in which FRP-confined square unreinforced and reinforced concrete columns of larger size under varying cyclic axial compression patterns were tested. In the current paper, the proposed stress-strain model is presented and it consists of three main components, namely (1) a monotonic stress-strain model to describe the envelope curve, (2) a polynomial expression for the unloading path, and (3) a straight line for the reloading path. The influence of internal longitudinal and hoop steel reinforcement is also considered in the proposed model, in addition to their influence on the ultimate stress and strain. The accuracy of the model is finally validated with an experimental database compiled of tests reported in the companion paper and other relevant tests extracted from the open literature DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000246. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available