4.6 Article

Size Effect of Concrete Short Columns Confined with Aramid FRP Jackets

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 535-544

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000178

Keywords

Size effect; Confined concrete columns; Fiber-reinforced polymer; Experimentation; Statistical analysis; Prediction model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50378002]
  2. Ministry of Communications of China [200431800058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most previous studies on concrete short columns confined with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites were based on small-scale testing, and size effect of the columns still has not been studied thoroughly. In this study, 99 confined concrete short columns wrapped with aramid FRP (AFRP) jackets and 36 unconfined concrete short columns with circular and square cross sections were tested under axial compressive loading. The circular specimens were divided into six groups, and the square specimens were divided into five groups, with each group containing different levels of the AFRP's confinement. In each group, the specimens were geometrically similar to one another and had three different scaling dimensions. Statistical analyses were used to evaluate the size and interaction effects between the specimen size and the AFRP's confinement, and a size-dependent model for predicting the strength of the columns was developed by modifying Bazant's size-effect law. The experimental results showed that the size of a specimen had a significant effect on the strength of AFRP-confined concrete short columns, lesser effect on the axial stress-strain curves, and slight effect on the failure modes. The modified Bazant model was in good agreement with the experimental data. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000178. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available