4.6 Article

Dynamic Response of a Sheet Pile of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer for Waterfront Barriers

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 974-984

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000231

Keywords

Fiber-reinforced polymer sheet pile; Dynamic response; Field application

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results from a combined experimental and advanced computational study to understand the dynamic response of a pultruded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheet pile of 9 m length that is installed into the ground near Venice, Italy. The peak embedment force of 10 kN is applied at the top as a sinusoidal compression force having a maximum frequency of circa 760 Hz. Physical measurements from accelerometers are reported for the lateral deformation response of a single sheet pile and of a unit restrained by an installed waterfront barrier. A finite-element modeling methodology for the two test configurations is developed by using the Strand7 code, so that advanced computational results can be compared against the field application measurements. Closed-form equations for the fundamental frequency are developed, with one accounting for the presence of rotary inertia and shear deformation. Dynamic responses at different embedment lengths (1-7 m) are examined, and a very good correlation is found between theory and practice. Numerically, the performance of the FRP sheet pile is compared with the response of a fictitious sheet pile of steel and with two new FRP geometries that increase stiffness to minimize flexure about the minor axis of bending. By increasing the mass by 10%, the maximum lateral displacement can be the same as the steel unit and 1/20 of the tested FRP unit. Findings of the research demonstrate that the FRP unit can be installed by using the same pile driving rig and procedure for steel sheet piling. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000231. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available