4.4 Article

Effect of the blocked ratio on properties of natural fiber-waterborne blocked polyurethane composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 49, Issue 16, Pages 1929-1936

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998314541303

Keywords

Waterborne blocked polyurethane; natural fiber; imidazole; dynamic mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials of Gansu Province, Key Laboratory of ECO-environment-related Polymer Materials Ministry of Education of Northwest Normal University [KF-09-1]
  2. Scholar Backbone Supporting Plan Project of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology [XSG2010013]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Projects of Shaanxi Province of China [2012NKC02-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, natural fiber/waterborne polyurethane composites were prepared from the imidazole blocked waterborne polyurethane and eucalyptus fiber mats. The related properties of blocked waterborne polyurethane and natural fiber/polyurethane composites were, respectively, measured by differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical analysis, dynamic contact angle, water absorption, and scanning electron microscope. The results showed that blocked waterborne polyurethane readily improved storage modulus (G') and dynamic loss (tan) of the composites. The blocked ratio determined the density of the cross-linking structure in natural fiber/polyurethane composite and significantly affected natural fiber/polyurethane composite's properties. With the increase of the blocked ratio, dynamic mechanical properties showed up a maximum value and the water absorption ratio reached a minimum value. The deblocking reaction of blocked waterborne polyurethane took place between 107.5? and 124.5?. Due to these results, blocked waterborne polyurethane used as a matrix improved the dynamic mechanical properties of natural fiber/polyurethane composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available