4.4 Article

Thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a polymer composite cured at different isothermal cure temperatures

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 575-587

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998311415443

Keywords

Epoxy prepreg; cure temperature variation; degree of cure; rheological properties; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX09AO58A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a commercial carbon fiber epoxy prepreg, Cycom 977-2 UD, were obtained for isothermal cure temperatures ranging from 149 degrees C to 182 degrees C. For each cure profile, an encapsulated-sample rheometer (ESR) was used to measure the storage modulus. Each ESR cure profile was followed by the glass transition temperature (T-g) test. The degree of cure (alpha) during cure and the heat of reaction of the prepreg were obtained using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Combined loading compression (CLC) and short-beam shear (SBS) tests were performed to obtain compressive properties and SBS strength, respectively. It was observed that the compressive properties did not vary significantly for the studied isothermal cure temperatures; likewise, the compressive failure mode was the same for all the CLC specimens. However, the SBS strength for the specimens cured at 149 degrees C was approximately 10% less than that of those cured at isothermal cure temperatures ranging from 160 degrees C to 182 degrees C. Further, the failure mode of the SBS specimens cured at 149 degrees C was also different from other specimens. The storage modulus of the ESR sample cured at 149 degrees C also showed a 10% decrease compared to other ESR samples. The SBS strength exhibited a good correlation with the storage modulus and a weak correlation with T-g and alpha.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available