4.4 Article

Analysis of the Film-stacking Processing Parameters for PLLA/Flax Fiber Biocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 1201-1215

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998309349019

Keywords

flax mats; PLLA bio-composites; transverse permeability; compressibility; film-stacking process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, the market demand for environmentally friendly materials is rapidly increasing. Biodegradable fibers and biodegradable polymers, mainly extracted from renewable resources, are expected to be a major contribution to the production of new industrial high performance biodegradable composites, partially solving the problem of waste management. At the end of its lifetime, a structural biodegradable composite can be crushed and recycled through a controlled industrial composting process. Bodros et al. [1] showed that biodegradable L-polylactide acid (PLLA)/flax fibers mat composites exhibiting specific tensile properties equivalent to glass fiber polyester composites can be manufactured by an un-optimized film-stacking process. In our study, the process has been investigated more extensively. Indeed, the compaction of flax mats requires a higher load than for glass mats of similar areal weight. The transverse permeability of flax mats has also been shown to be lower than for glass mats. In both cases, this is due to a higher degree of entanglement of the flax fibers within the mat. However, the range of permeability and compressibility values of the flax mats are well within the values that allow a good through-the-thickness impregnation. Flax fibers cannot sustain long exposures at the impregnation temperature of the mats by PLLA resin. Through-the-thickness impregnation of flax mats processes such as film stacking are more suitable than in-plane impregnation processes such as resin transfer molding because the flow of resin is limited on short distances and allows short times of impregnation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available