4.4 Article

A Comparison of Various Kinematic Models for Sandwich Shell Panels with Soft Core

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 43, Issue 20, Pages 2201-2221

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998309343716

Keywords

sandwich shells; soft core; classical 2D theories; equivalent single layer theories; layer wise theories; Murakami's zig-zag function; mixed models; Carrera's unified formulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large variety of classical and advanced shell theories are assessed in the present work to evaluate bending response of sandwich shell structures with soft core. The accuracy of classical, higher order, zig-zag, layer-wise, and mixed theories is compared in the case of closed form solutions of simply supported shell panels made by two external skins and an internal soft core. Thickness strain effects have been evaluated too. The various theories have been implemented in a compact and concise form by referring to Carrera's unified formulation (CUF) for plate/shell analysis that has been, in the recent past, introduced by the first author. Shell theories accuracy has been established with respect to a geometrical parameter (length-to-thickness-ratio) and to a mechanical one (face-to-core-stiffness-ratio). Soft core cases have been mostly analyzed. Two main sources of error have been outlined, which are related to the geometrical parameter and to the mechanical one, respectively. It has been concluded that higher order theories (HOTs) can be conveniently used to reduce the error due to the geometrical parameter in thick shell cases. HOTs are instead not effective to increase the accuracy of classical theories analysis whenever the error is caused by increasing values of the mechanical parameter; layer-wise analysis becomes mandatory in this last case. Among the considered equivalent single layer theories, of particular interest are those zig-zag theories that make use of Murakami's zig-zag function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available