4.2 Article

Prey Availability Influences the Ontogeny and Timing of Chemoreception-Based Prey Shifting in the Striped Crayfish Snake, Regina alleni

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages 49-55

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0029267

Keywords

chemoreception; ontogeny; crayfish snake; prey availability

Funding

  1. Association for the Study of Ichthyology and Herpetology Gaige Fund Award
  2. Chicago Herpetological Society
  3. Department of Psychology and the Science Alliance of the University of Tennessee
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. GREBE (Graduate Researchers in Ecology Behavior and Evolution), University of Tennessee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Striped crayfish snakes (Regina alleni) undergo a dietary shift from dragonfly larvae to crayfish during ontogeny. Godley (1980) suggested that this shift is attributable to crayfish availability rather than an initial preference for dragonfly larvae. We experimentally tested this hypothesis by measuring the chemosensory response of newborn snakes to prey odors at 2 ages and also after they were fed on either dragonfly larvae or crayfish. The results show that R. alleni respond equally to dragonfly larvae, hard crayfish, and soft crayfish before feeding experience. We also show that the maintenance of this preference over fish and control stimuli is subsequently determined by the prey type encountered, through an unusual interaction. Snakes fed dragonfly larvae increased their chemosensory response to both dragonfly larvae and crayfish, whereas snakes fed crayfish increased their response only to crayfish. Our study demonstrates that innate chemosensory responses to prey can be modified by prey availability and that they do not necessarily result from maturation alone. Such plasticity has adaptive value to newborn animals that must fend for themselves from birth and respond to changing environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available