4.2 Article

Rotational Displacement Skills in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages 421-432

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0028757

Keywords

object-tracking; rotational displacement; rhesus macaques

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [5P40RR003640]
  2. Yale University
  3. International Primatological Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rotational displacement tasks, in which participants must track an object at a hiding location within an array while the array rotates, exhibit a puzzling developmental pattern in humans. Human children take an unusually long time to master this task and tend to solve rotational problems through the use of nongeometric features or landmarks as opposed to other kinds of spatial cues. We investigated whether these developmental characteristics are unique to humans by testing rotational displacement skills in a monkey species, the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), using a looking-time method. Monkeys first saw food hidden in two differently colored boxes within an array. The array was then rotated 1800 and the boxes reopened to reveal the food in an expected or unexpected location. Our first two experiments explored the developmental time-course of performance on this rotational displacement task. We found that adult macaques looked longer at the unexpected event, but such performance was not mirrored in younger-aged macaques. In a third study, we systematically varied featural information and visible access to the array to investigate which strategies adult macaques used in solving rotational displacements. Our results show that adult macaques need both sets of information to solve the task. Taken together, these results suggest both similarities and differences in mechanisms by which human and nonhuman primates develop this spatial skill.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available