4.2 Article

The Development of Caching and Object Permanence in Western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica): Which Emerges First?

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 295-303

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0016303

Keywords

Western scrub-jay; object permanence; sensorimotor intelligence; caching development; cognition

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. University of Cambridge
  3. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D000335/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies on the food-caching behavior of corvids have revealed complex physical and social skills, yet little is known about the ontogeny of food caching in relation to the development of cognitive capacities. Piagetian object permanence is the understanding that objects continue to exist even when they are no longer visible. Here, the authors focus on Piagetian Stages 3 and 4, because they are hallmarks in the cognitive development of both young children and animals. Our aim is to determine in a food-caching corvid, the Western scrub-jay, whether (1) Piagetian Stage 4 competence and tentative caching (i.e., hiding an item invisibly and retrieving it without delay), emerge concomitantly or consecutively; (2) whether experiencing the reappearance of hidden objects enhances the timing of the appearance of object permanence; and (3) discuss how the development of object permanence is related to behavioral development and sensorimotor intelligence. Our findings suggest that object permanence Stage 4 emerges before tentative caching, and independent of environmental influences, but that once the birds have developed simple object-permanence, then social learning might advance the interval after which tentative caching commences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available