4.2 Article

The easy-to-hard effect in human (Homo sapiens) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) auditory identification

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages 132-145

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.132

Keywords

transfer; discrimination learning; representation; perception

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K01 MH067952-02, MH 67952, K01 MH067952-03, K01 MH067952-05, K01 MH067952, K01 MH067952-01, K01 MH067952-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors examined whether progressively training humans and rats to perform a difficult auditory identification task led to larger improvements than extensive training with highly similar sounds (the easy-to-hard effect). Practice improved humans' ability to distinguish sounds regardless of the training regimen. However, progressively trained subjects were more accurate and showed more generalization, despite significantly less training with the stimuli that were the most difficult to distinguish. Rats showed less capacity to improve with practice but still benefited from progressive training. These findings indicate that transitioning from an easier to a more difficult task during training can facilitate, and in some cases may be essential for, auditory perceptual learning. The results are not predicted by an explanation that assumes interaction of generalized excitation and inhibition but are consistent with a hierarchical account of perceptual learning in which the representational precision required to distinguish stimuli determines the mechanisms engaged during learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available