4.5 Article

Specificity and Efficiency of Reporter Expression in Adult Neural Progenitors Vary Substantially Among Nestin-CreERT2 Lines

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 522, Issue 5, Pages 1191-1208

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23497

Keywords

adult hippocampal neurogenesis; subgranular zone; ectopic expression; lineage tracing; cerebellum; ROSA26 Cre reporter

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Office of the Director [DP2 OD001734]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R21MH101583]
  3. National Institute of Aging [T32 AG000183]
  4. Robert and Renee Belfer Family Foundation, Neurodegeneration Consortium (NDC)
  5. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [5P30HD024064-25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transgenic lines expressing a controllable form of Cre recombinase have become valuable tools for manipulating gene expression in adult neural progenitors and their progeny. Neural progenitors express several proteins that distinguish them from mature neurons, and the promoters for these genes have been co-opted to produce selective transgene expression within this population. To date, nine CreER(T2) transgenic lines have been designed using the nestin promoter; however, only a subset are capable of eliciting expression within both neurogenic zones of the adult brain. Here we compare three such nestin-CreER(T2) lines to evaluate specificity of expression and efficiency of recombination. Each line was examined by using three different Cre reporter strains that varied in sensitivity. We found that all three nestin-CreER(T2) strains induced reporter expression within the main neurogenic areas, albeit to varying degrees depending on the reporter. Unexpectedly, we found that two of the three lines induced substantial reporter expression outside of neurogenic areas. These lines produced strong labeling in cerebellar granule neurons, with additional expression in the cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus. Reporter expression in the third nestin-CreER(T2) line was considerably more specific, but was also less efficient, labeling a smaller percentage of the target population than the other two drivers. Our findings suggest that each nestin-CreER(T2) line may best serve different experimental needs, depending on whether specificity or efficiency is of greatest concern. Our study further demonstrates that each new pair of driver and responder lines should be evaluated independently, as both components can significantly influence the resulting expression pattern. J. Comp. Neurol. 522:1191-1208, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available