4.5 Article

Variations in Microanatomy of the Human Cochlea

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 522, Issue 14, Pages 3245-3261

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23594

Keywords

cochlear implant; scala tympani; mu CT; hearing preservation; individualized therapy

Funding

  1. Advanced Bionics
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG
  3. Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human cochlea shows considerable interindividual variability in size and morphology. In order to develop atraumatic cochlear implant (CI) electrodes, high-precision details of the variability of human anatomy are required. Sixteen human temporal bones were cut around the cochlea in blocks of approximately 3.5 x 3.5 cm. The bones were scanned by using a Skyscan 1173 micro-computed tomography (mu CT) device. Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was used to segment out the scala tympani (ST) from the mu CT images. A three-dimensional surface model of the segmented area was generated for each cochlea. Cross-sectional images were taken and analyzed by customdesigned software in MATLAB. Comparison of different STs showed large variability in cross-sectional diameter (CSD), vertical trajectory, and height of the ST. Relative standard deviations of the CSD were between 9 and 15%. Heights measured at the center of the ST exceeded those in the modiolar and lateral regions of the scala. At the lateral region, the height decreased significantly at the beginning of the second turn. In the vertical trajectory, critical anatomic features were observed, such as dips, vertical jumps, and peaks. Rosenthal's canal (RC) extended to between 560 and 650 degrees. We found a correlation between the length of the RC and that of the ST. The ST was segmented and the internal dimensions measured by using mu CT. We observed large dimensional variability between different STs. These differences could have considerable implications for approaches to the design of CI arrays, especially in terms of their ability to preserve residual hearing during insertion of the electrode array. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available