4.5 Article

Cortical Connections of the Visual Pulvinar Complex in Prosimian Galagos (Otolemur garnetti)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 517, Issue 4, Pages 493-511

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22162

Keywords

superior colliculus; visual cortex; middle temporal area; area 17; area 18; primate evolution; thalamus

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [EY 02686]
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY002686] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pulvinar complex of prosimian primates is not as architectonically differentiated as that of anthropoid primates. Thus, the functional subdivisions of the complex have been more difficult to determine. In the present study, we related patterns of connections of cortical visual areas (primary visual area, V1; secondary visual area, V2; and middle temporal visual area, MT) as well as the superior colliculus of the visual midbrain, with subdivisions of the pulvinar complex of prosimian galagos (Otolemur garnetti) that were revealed in brain sections processed for cell bodies (Nissl), cytochrome oxidase, or myelin. As in other primates, the architectonic methods allowed us to distinguish the lateral pulvinar (PL) and inferior pulvinar (PI) as major divisions of the visual pulvinar. The connection patterns further allowed us to divide PI into a large central nucleus (Plc), a medial nucleus (Plm), and a posterior nucleus (Pip). Both PL and Plc have separate topographic patterns of connections with V1 and V2. A third, posterior division of PI, Pip, does not appear to project to Vi and V2 and is further distinguished by receiving inputs from the superior colliculus. All these subdivisions of PI project to MT. The evidence suggests that PL of galagos contains a single, large nucleus, as in monkeys, and that PI may have only three subdivisions, rather than the four subdivisions of monkeys. In addition, the cortical projections of PI nuclei are more widespread than those in monkeys. Thus, the pulvinar nuclei in prosimian primates and anthropoid primates have evolved along somewhat different paths. J. Comp. Neurol. 517:493-511, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available