4.7 Article

Biowaste-based porous carbon for supercapacitor: The influence of preparation processes on structure and performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 535, Issue -, Pages 276-286

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.055

Keywords

Biowastes; Porous carbon; Supercapacitor; Hierarchical porous structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406056]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [B2017011]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for Post Doctor [LBH-Q17147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, a series of porous carbon based supercapacitor electrode materials have been synthesized by means of pyrolysis and hydrothermal methods combining with KOH activation using the biomass wastes mung bean husks as resources. The influence of synthesis process on the morphology, structure and supercapacitor performance of mung bean husks derived porous carbons has been investigated systematically. Especially, it is found that these oxygen-containing groups on the biochar play a crucial role in fabricating the three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical porous structure carbon. The original bio-structured porous carbon (PC3-600), the 3D architecture porous carbon (HPC2-700) and the porous carbon block (HPPC2-700) have a high specific surface area, and the former mainly contains micropores and the latter two possess multistage pores. The specific capacitance of PC3-600, HPC2-700 and HPPC2-700 is respectively up to 390 F g(-1), 353 F g(-1), 304 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), and still maintains as high as 287 F g(-1), 270 F g(-1) and 235 F g(-1) with corresponding retention ratio of 73.5%, 76.48%, 77.3% even at a high current density of 50 A g(-1). HPC2-700//HPC2-700 symmetric supercapacitor achieves a high energy density of 20.4 Wh kg(-1) at 872 W kg(-1) in 1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available