4.7 Article

Effect of strong acids on red mud structural and fluoride adsorption properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 423, Issue -, Pages 158-165

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.02.019

Keywords

Acid stability; Adsorption; Bauxite residue; Fluoride; Red mud

Funding

  1. Energy and Process Engineering Discipline of the Science and Engineering Faculty
  2. Institute of Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE120101890]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE120101890] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The removal of fluoride using red mud has been improved by acidifying red mud with hydrochloric, nitric and sulphuric acid. The acidification of red mud causes sodalite and cancrinite phases to dissociate, confirmed by the release of sodium and aluminium into solution as well as the disappearance of sodalite bands and peaks in infrared and X-ray diffraction data. The dissolution of these mineral phases increases the amount of available iron and aluminium oxide/hydroxide sites that are accessible for the adsorption of fluoride. However, concentrated acids have a negative effect on adsorption due to the dissolution of these iron and aluminium oxide/hydroxide sites. The removal of fluoride is dependent on the charge of iron and aluminium oxide/hydroxides on the surface of red mud. Acidifying red mud with hydrochloric, nitric and sulphuric acid resulted in surface sites of the form SOH2+ and SOH. Optimum removal is obtained when the majority of surface sites are in the form SOH2+ as the substitution of a fluoride ion does not cause a significant increase in pH. This investigation shows the importance of having a low and consistent pH for the removal of fluoride from aqueous solutions using red mud. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available