4.7 Article

Effect of surface chemical and structural heterogeneity of copper-based MOF/graphite oxide composites on the adsorption of ammonia

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 417, Issue -, Pages 109-114

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.010

Keywords

Graphite oxide; Metal-organic framework; Composites; Ammonia adsorption

Funding

  1. ARO Grant [W911NF-10-1-0039]
  2. NSF collaborative Grant [CBET 1133112]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1133112] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two graphite oxides (GOs), obtained by oxidation of graphites of different origins, were used as composite components with copper-based metal-organic frameworks, MOFs. Such composites were tested for ammonia adsorption at room temperature, in dry and moist conditions. The materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction, FT-IR spectroscopy, adsorption of nitrogen, and thermal analysis. Generally, the ammonia adsorption capacities of the composites were found to be lower than those calculated for the physical mixture of their components. An involvement of NH3 adsorption sites of MOF in a composite formation was found to be a major factor, lowering the adsorption capacity of a composite in dry conditions. The composites with the smaller amount of GO were found to be better adsorbents of ammonia in the absence of moisture than those, with the higher amount of GO. The adsorption of ammonia in moist conditions resulted in a collapse of MOF structure, accompanied by the release of active groups. These groups contributed to the enhanced adsorption of ammonia via acid-base reactions. Thus, in the presence of moisture, the composites with the higher amounts of GO, and the ones, containing more carboxylic groups than epoxy groups in GO, were found to be the best performing samples. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available