4.7 Article

Effects of background electrolytes and ionic strength on enrichment of Cd(II) ions with magnetic graphene oxide-supported sulfanilic acid

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages 138-144

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.054

Keywords

Background electrolyte; Ionic strength; Effect; Adsorption; Cd(II) species; Visual MINTEQ

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271332]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Hunan Province, China [2012SK2021]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate [CX2012B138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To elucidate the influence mechanisms of background electrolytes and ionic strength on Cd(II) removal, the adsorption of Cd(II) onto magnetic graphene oxide-supported sulfanilic acid (MGO-SA) in aqueous solutions containing different types and concentrations of background electrolytes was studied. The results indicate that Cd(II) adsorption was strongly dependent on pH and could be strongly affected by background electrolytes and ionic strength. The Cd(II) removal was decreased with the presence of background electrolyte cations (Ne, K, Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+), and the divalent cations exerted more obvious influences on the Cd(II) uptake than the monovalent cations at pH 6. Both Cl- and NO3- had negative effects on Cd(II) adsorption because they can form water-soluble metal-anion complexes with Cd(II) ions. The presence of 0.01 mol Na3PO4 reduced the removal percentage of Cd(II) at pH < 5 but extremely enhanced the Cd(II) removal when the pH > 5. The Cd(II) adsorption was sensitive to changes in the concentration of NaCl, NaNO3, NaClO4, and Na3PO4. Besides, the adsorption isotherm of Cd(II) onto MGO-SA could be well described by the Freundlich model and was also influenced by the type of background electrolyte ions and the ionic strength. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available