4.7 Article

Improving sensitivity and accuracy of pore structural characterisation using scanning curves in integrated gas sorption and,mercury porosimetry experiments

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 417, Issue -, Pages 88-99

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.025

Keywords

Pore size distribution; Adsorption; Scanning curve; Hysteresis; Mercury porosimetry; Advanced adsorption; Catalyst; X-ray imaging

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. Johnson Matthey
  3. EPSRC [EP/K011820/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K011820/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas sorption scanning curves are increasingly used as a means to supplement the pore structural information implicit in boundary adsorption and desorption isotherms to obtain more detailed pore space descriptors for disordered solids. However, co-operative adsorption phenomena set fundamental limits to the level of information that conventional scanning curve experiments can deliver. In this work, we use the novel integrated gas sorption and mercury porosimetry technique to show that crossing scanning curves are obtained for some through ink-bottle pores within a disordered solid, thence demonstrating that their shielded pore bodies are undetectable using conventional scanning experiments. While gas sorption alone was not sensitive enough to detect these pore features, the integrated technique was, and, thence, this synergistic method is more powerful than the two individual techniques applied separately. The integrated method also showed how the appropriate filling mechanism equation (e.g. meniscus geometry for capillary condensation equations), to use to convert filling pressure to pore size, varied with position along the adsorption branch, thereby enabling avoidance of the further systematic error introduced into PSDs by assuming a single filling mechanism for disordered solids. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available