4.7 Article

A comparative study on selective adsorption of metal ions using aminated adsorbents

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 395, Issue -, Pages 230-240

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.047

Keywords

Mesoporous silica; MCM-41; Chitosan; Selectivity; Adsorption

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well-known that chitosan consists of amino groups for the chelation of metal ions while NH2-MCM-41 has excellent adsorption selectivities for metals. This work compares both adsorption capacities and selectivities of chitosan and NH2-MCM-41. It has been found that chitosan has adsorption capacities of 1.76 mmol/g, 1.03 mmol/g and 1.30 mmol/g for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ respectively whereas NH2-MCM-41 has adsorption capacity of 1.52 mmol/g, 0.8 mmol/g and 0.83 mmol/g for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+. The higher adsorption capacity in chitosan is attributed to its higher loading of amine groups. The single component adsorption isotherms were well-fitted using Freundlich model. The binary adsorptions of Cu2+-Zn2+ and Ni2+-Zn2+ systems showed similar adsorption selectivities for both adsorbents. However, chitosan has no preferential adsorption for Ni2+-Zn2+ system while NH2-MCM-41 has a good selectivity towards Zn2+. It is believed that the difference can be attributed to the heterogeneous surface of chitosan due to its organic nature. The multi-component adsorptions were best described by a multicomponent extended Freundlich model. Despite the surface functional group, this work indicates the importance of the adsorbent support on selective adsorption. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available