4.7 Article

Influence of drying method on the surface energy of cellulose nanofibrils determined by inverse gas chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 405, Issue -, Pages 85-95

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.033

Keywords

Cellulose nanofibrils; Drying; Surface energy; Inverse gas chromatography

Funding

  1. Maine Economic Improvement Fund
  2. USDA Forest Service Forest Product Laboratory [11-JV-11111124-079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research and development of the renewable nanomaterial cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) has received considerable attention. The effect of drying on the surface energy of CNFs was investigated. Samples of nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) were each subjected to four separate drying methods: air-drying, freeze-drying, spray-drying, and supercritical-drying. The surface morphology of the dried CNFs was examined using a scanning electron microscope. The surface energy of the dried CNFs was determined using inverse gas chromatography at infinite dilution and column temperatures: 30, 40, 50, 55, and 60 degrees C. Surface energy measurements of supercritical-dried NFCs were performed also at column temperatures: 70, 75, and 80 degrees C Different drying methods produced CNFs with different morphologies which in turn significantly influenced their surface energy. Supercritical-drying resulted in NFCs having a dispersion component of surface energy of 98.3 +/- 5.8 mJ/m(2) at 30 degrees C The dispersion component of surface energy of freeze-dried NFCs (44.3 +/- 0.4 mJ/m(2) at 30 degrees C) and CNCs (46.5 +/- 0.9 mJ/m(2) at 30 degrees C) were the lowest among all the CNFs. The pre-freezing treatment during the freeze-drying process is hypothesized to have a major impact on the dispersion component of surface energy of the CNFs. The acid and base parameters of all the dried CNFs were amphoteric (acidic and basic) although predominantly basic in nature. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available