4.7 Article

Tuning, via Counter Anions, the Morphology and Catalytic Activity of CeO2 Prepared under Mild Conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 373, Issue -, Pages 46-56

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.050

Keywords

Homogeneous precipitation; Nano-CeO2; Anion controlled morphology; Soot oxidation; Catalysis

Funding

  1. Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Ministry of Defense, New Delhi, India [ERIP/ER/0600319/M/01/1052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advanced synthetic methods under mild and controlled conditions for the synthesis of nanocrystals with specific shapes and exposed surfaces are very important for understanding the surface related properties and to explore their structure-property relationship for various potential applications. Here, we report the synthesis of highly uniform CeO2 nanorods and nanoflowers in large scale using non-hydrothermal homogeneous precipitation method with urea as a precipitating agent and CTAB as a shape directing agent. Uniform microstructures of CeO2 samples were selectively synthesized using chloride and nitrate as the counter anions. The samples were characterized by thermal analysis, X-ray diffraction, N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, SEM, TEM, UV-Vis-DRS, and Raman spectroscopy, and temperature programmed reduction as well as desorption methods. The results show that the physicochemical and optical properties of CeO2 samples significantly differ with their surface microstructure and morphology. They also strongly influence the redox property, oxygen storage capacity, and surface acidity of the CeO2 samples. The CeO2 samples with different morphologies were tested for their soot oxidation activity. The CeO2 sample with nanorod morphology was found to be more active due to larger CeO2/soot interface than the CeO2 sample with nanoflower morphology. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available