4.7 Article

Carbonated ferric green rust as a new material for efficient phosphate removal

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 384, Issue -, Pages 121-127

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.038

Keywords

Ferric green rust; Phosphate; Adsorption; Kinetics; Freundlich model; pH effect

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) project
  2. ADEME [ECOTECH2009, 0994C0103]
  3. SAUR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphate uptake from aqueous solutions by a recently discovered ferric oxyhydroxide is investigated. Carbonated ferric green rust {GR(CO32-)*} is prepared by varying two synthesis parameters, which are (1) the aging period after the ferrous-ferric green rust {(GR(CO32-)} synthesis step and (2) the rate of the hydrogen peroxide addition to oxidize GR(CO32-) into GR(CO32-)*. These two parameters permit the control of the size, morphology and cristallinity of the synthesized particles. As prepared GR* samples are then evaluated, in batch experiments, as possible low-cost efficient phosphate removal materials. Firstly, kinetic experiments reveal that a fast sorption step initially occurs and equilibrium is reached at similar to 500 min. The adsorption kinetics data at pH = 7 can be adequately fitted to a pseudo-second order model. Secondly, the Freundlich model provides the best correlation and effectively describes phosphate sorption isotherms for all GR(CO32-)* samples synthesized. Finally, the phosphate adsorption capacity decreases when pH increases. The highest adsorption capacity is 64.8 mg g(-1) at pH = 4 and corresponds to the GR(CO32-)* sample displaying the smallest and least crystallized particles thus reflecting the importance of the synthesis conditions. Overall, all sorption capacities are higher than the main iron oxide minerals, making GR(CO32-)* a potentially attractive phosphate adsorbent. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available