4.7 Article

Sorption of aqueous antimony and arsenic species onto akaganeite

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 357, Issue 2, Pages 460-465

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.095

Keywords

Arsenic species; Antimony species; Sorption isotherms; Sorption competition; Water treatment

Funding

  1. BMBF [03G0710E]
  2. HGF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two akaganeite materials were tested for the removal of antimonate, trimethyl antimonate, arsenate, arsenite, and dimethyl arsenate from water: a commercial product (GEH) and a synthesized akaganeite. The two materials show similar q(max) values, but differ in their K-L values. This could be a result of their different crystal sizes indicated by sharper XRD reflections of the synthesized akaganeite compared with GEH. Batch experiments were carried out using all species to investigate the influence of the pH on their sorption onto the commercial material. The best results for the removal of antimonate and arsenate were achieved under acidic conditions, while the sorption of arsenite has an optimum at pH 7. The maximum loadings vary from 450 mg g(-1) (antimonate at pH 2.2.) to 2 mg g(-1) (trimethyl antimonate at pH 7). Competition reactions (up to a 10-fold excess of the competitor ion) were studied with antimonate, arsenate, and phosphate. The sorption capacity of arsenate decreases up to 12.5% by adding phosphate (ratio 1:10), but the addition of antimonate did not influence the sorption of arsenate. Conversely, the sorption of antimonate decreases due to the addition of 10-fold concentration of arsenate (31%) or phosphate (27%). (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available