Journal
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 349, Issue 1, Pages 275-282Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.018
Keywords
Bentonite; Specific surface area; Smectites
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The specific surface areas (SSA(N2BET)) of 36 different bentonites had larger values for Ca2+/Mg2+ bentonites than for Na+ bentonites. This trend could not be explained by the different d(0 0 1) values nor by the different microstructures. The investigation of Cu-triene-exchanged smectites, which on drying at 105 degrees C still had a d(0 0 1) value accounting for approximately 13 angstrom, proved that the SSA(N2BET) of low-charged smectites increased more than that of high-charged smectites. This could be explained by: (i) more space between the permanent charge sites in the case of low-charged smectites and (ii) the fact that the layers of Cu-triene smectites do not collapse at 105 degrees C. In contrast the SSA(N2BET) of Ca2+-exchanged bentonites could not be related to the layer charge density (LCD) as in the case of the Cu-triene-exchanged bentonites which is probably due to the varying number of collapsed layers. In conclusion, the SSA(N2BET) of bentonites which is known to be largely variable is probably determined by microporosity resulting from the quasi-crystalline overlap region and accessible areas of the interlayer. The number of layers per stack and the microstructure are supposed to play a subordinate role. The larger SSA(N2BET) of Ca/Mg bentonites compared to Na bentonites probably can be explained by the larger space between the charges in the case of the presence of divalent cations.(C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available