4.7 Article

Comparative study of thiol-free amphiphilic hyperbranched and linear polymers for the stabilization of large gold nanoparticles in organic solvent

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 337, Issue 2, Pages 485-491

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.047

Keywords

Amphiphilic; Gold nanoparticle; Hyperbranched polymer; Phase transfer; Polyethylenimine

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20704030, 20804027]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20070056046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amphiphilic hyperbranched and linear polymers based on the respective palmitic acid modified hyperbranched and linear polyethylenimines have been successfully employed to transfer the citrate-protected 17-nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) from water into chloroform without the aid of other compounds. Compared with their corresponding linear analog, the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers exhibited higher efficiency in transferring the large AuNPs. The chloroform solutions of AuNPs were characterized by UV-vis spectrometry and dynamic light scattering. It was found that aggregated AuNPs existed in the system with the amphiphilic linear polymer as stabilizer, whereas much less aggregated AuNPS could be detected in the system with the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymer as stabilizer. Furthermore the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers could form relatively homogeneous and densely packed shell around the gold core revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Stability experiments showed that the solution of AuNPs coated with the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers were more stable than those coated with their linear analogs. Moreover, the AuNPs capped with the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers could be also stored in dryness for long time. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available